Fwd: Rejected posting to CALNDR-L@LISTSERV.ECU.EDU

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Fwd: Rejected posting to CALNDR-L@LISTSERV.ECU.EDU

Brij Bhushan metric VIJ
Resending the mail, sirs.
Brij B. Vij

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
Date: March 3, 2017 at 4:13:13 PM MST
To: Brij B Vij <[hidden email]>
Subject: Fwd: Rejected posting to [hidden email]

FYI

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: [hidden email]
Date: March 3, 2017 at 4:01:57 PM MST
To: Brij B Vij <[hidden email]>, Brij B Vij <[hidden email]>
Subject: Fwd: Rejected posting to [hidden email]

Forwarding the mail rejected from my other iPhone account: [hidden email]
Thanks & regards,
Brij Bhushan Vij
Author, Brij-Gregorian Modified calendar
Friday, 2017 March 03H16:03 (decimal)

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: "ECU LISTSERV Server (16.0)" <[hidden email]>
Date: March 3, 2017 at 3:55:20 PM MST
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Rejected posting to [hidden email]

You  are  not  authorized  to  send   mail  to  the  CALNDR-L  list  from  your
[hidden email] account.  You might be authorized  to post to the  list from
another account, or perhaps when using another mail program configured to use a
different email address.  However, LISTSERV has no way to  associate this other
account  or address  with yours.  If you  need assistance  or if  you have  any
questions regarding  the policy of the  CALNDR-L list, please contact  the list
owners at [hidden email].

Karl, list sits:

>The minimum displacement calendar would >have a 417-year cycle of 74 leap weeks, >rather than 834 years of 834/6 + 9 = 148 >leap weeks.

I am great full to the list in evaluating my 896-years and (896-62=834)-years cycles in addition to my demonstrated Tithi/Phase values using 19-years/6932.5 tithi with Tithi=No. of days in 896-years/No. of Tithi (in 11082x29.5) lunar moons or 1 +338/ 326919 day, possibly used during flourishing days of Indus civilisation, as discussed! 

Mean Year (834-years)=7*(52+1/6+9/834)= 365.242206235012 days.

While I may not be competent to make the choice between "displacement and jitter" in the calendar TO BE, I feel the independent existence of my 417-years cycle may not pass the Mean Year test, although its mean Year for (2x417=834-years) passes this criteria, to follow divide SIX Leap Weeks.

A similar situation arose wrt my 896-years & placing Keplers' Leap Weeks in (3x896= 2688-years) BUT both having the same Mean Year =365.2421875 days, in working with 'divide six (6) Leap Weeks'!

Regards,

Brij Bhushan metric VIJ

Author, Brij-Gregorian Modified Calendar

Friday, 2017 March 03H15:91 (decimal)


Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 3, 2017, at 5:59 AM, Karl Palmen <[hidden email]> wrote:

using the same mean year.

The jitter is shown in http://home.primus.ca/~kalendis/solar/jitter-charts-leap-week.pdf

The minimum displacement calendar would have a 417-year cycle of 74 leap weeks, rather than 834 years of 834/6 + 9 = 148 leap weeks.


ATT00001.htm (248 bytes) Download Attachment
Loading...